Zac Gibson

Product Analyst×AI Product Builder×Author

I work in healthcare technology,
build digital products with AI, and write fiction.

01
Start with
a clear task
02
Gather
the evidence
03
Check
the decision
04
Keep
the record

AI / MEMORY & VERIFICATION

SLUICE

Better memory starts with evidence.

Brings back relevant context and checks the evidence before saving a new lesson. Explore how it handles a decision, including when it has to stop.

The operating rules

BOUNDOnly relevant context enters.PROVEDClaim and same-run evidence travel together.RECORDEDAllow, deny, or hold keeps its reason.

How SLUICE works Explore SLUICE

SLUICE / CONTROL CURRENTTRACE 01 / 05

CONTEXT BOUNDEVIDENCE CHECKEDREADY ON VIEW

working kernel 01 · memory promotion

Should this become standing context?

An assistant wants to keep a useful preference for future work.

requestRemember this preference
bounded contextConversation + current task
evidenceNo exact source span attached
policy gatePromotion needs source + proof ID
receiptMemory unchanged; reason kept

WHYA plausible lesson is still refused when its origin cannot be inspected.

CONTROL BOUNDARYOne working kernel path and four illustrative transfer patterns—not live integrations or autonomous authority.

EXAMPLE RECEIPTDENYMemory unchanged; reason kept

One working kernel · four illustrative patterns · each example keeps its reason

See the recorded SLUICE showcase

Inspect this capture

SLUICE public showcase stating an unsupported dual-win marketing claim was refused — WHAT TO NOTICE
The public showcase refuses an unsupported smarter-model claim. Its terminal is receipt-backed theater, not evidence of enforcement across every caller.
Public showcase · receipt-backed theater · callable does not mean enforced
Source & recording details
Source page
sluice.zacgibson.work/
Displayed image
Recorded frame · 24 SEP 2026
Date label source
Supplied metadata
Full record
22 SEP 2026 (opens in a new tab)
The detail and full record are separate saved images. Their dates are recorded independently.
Open source site (opens in a new tab)

All recorded images:

IDENTITY / FICTIONAL HEALTH NETWORK

Northbridge
Horizon

IAM lab for a fictional health network.

Follow a proposed access change from source evidence to policy review and a human decision.

How the lab works →

Inspect this capture

Northbridge Horizon v22 fictional healthcare lab: Test access changes. Keep care moving. — WHAT TO NOTICE
Start with a fictional hospital case: test an access change, find a smaller repair, and check whether needed care access recovers.
Recorded v22 · fictional teaching lab · no real access changes
Source & recording details
Source page
Northbridge Horizon v22 / command center
Displayed image
Full record · 20 OCT 2026
Date label source
Supplied metadata
Recorded edition
v22 source rendered locally at 2× density; fictional teaching lab
Source revision
7cb2ac26e4667e173e5446cd3cfa8f3872d2c451
Open Northbridge Horizon (opens in a new tab)

All recorded images:

See the five access checks

MechanismDescriptionIdentity path (sandbox)Path state

01Source evidencesynthetic HR and credential facts establish the casesource attachedmodeled

02Identity contextresolve role, assignment, facility, and scopecontext resolvedmodeled

03Candidate plancompile the proposed entitlement differenceplan preparedcandidate

04Policy reviewinspect eligibility, explicit deny, and conflictspolicy evaluatedreview

05Human ownershipbind accountable review to the exact planwriter heldbounded

CONTROL BOUNDARYFICTIONAL NETWORK · NO PHI · REVIEWABLE PATH

Inside the access workflow

THE COMMAND CENTER / FROM SOURCE TO AUTHORITY

Follow the access.
Find the boundary.

Explore a fictional health system. Inspect the candidate plan, the policy it must satisfy, and the evidence required before the next step.

Modeled identities: 30,000
Application services: 648
IAM domains: 5
Production writes: 0

Four roles. No autonomous authority.

Access Concierge: Structure the request.
Lifecycle Orchestrator: Prepare a candidate plan.
Governance Assurance: Explain policy and evidence.
Application Integration: Simulate the connector and read-back.

Deterministic agent simulations. These roles cannot authorize access or write directly to a target.

Explore the IAM laboratory

CLINICIAN JOINER / ILLUSTRATED PATH

Authority has a stopping point.

Open any step to read the evidence.

EstablishStart with source evidence.
A synthetic HR event, credential evidence, and assignment establish the case. Missing evidence holds the request.
ResolveResolve identity and scope.
Access Concierge structures the request. Role, department, facility, and assignment determine its context.
CompilePrepare the smallest valid plan.
Lifecycle Orchestrator compiles a candidate entitlement difference. Preparing a plan does not grant access.
ControlCheck policy before permission.
Eligibility, explicit deny, least privilege, and separation of duties are evaluated. Governance Assurance explains the evidence.
AccountBind review to the exact plan.
A named human owner must review the candidate. A changed plan needs fresh review. This illustrated case stops here.
ExecuteHold at the writer boundary.
Application Integration previews the target operation. The laboratory has no production writer.
ProveRequire independent read-back.
The reference design compares target state with the approved plan and keeps the result. This simulation makes no external change.

CASE STOPS AT 05Awaiting accountable ownerStages 06–07 remain outside this case’s authority.

Fictional network · synthetic identities · no PHI · no production authority

RESEARCH / PUBLISHING

Righteous Recon

Gear should earn its place.

Gear research across six disciplines. Follow the sources, compare the tradeoffs, and see what still needs to be proven.

DEVELOPMENT EDITION Recorded September 24.

Inspect this capture

Righteous Recon development homepage with an editorial-preview banner and Gear should earn its place headline — WHAT TO NOTICE
The development homepage pairs the research with its questions and sources. Its visible preview banner says publication approval is pending.
Recorded development edition · draft research · no approved recommendations
Source & recording details
Source page
Righteous Recon / development homepage
Displayed image
Full record · 24 SEP 2026
Date label source
Supplied metadata
Recorded edition
Historical development preview; exact render revision not recorded
Open source site (opens in a new tab)

All recorded images:

The editorial direction — 24 SEP 2026
Research by activity — 24 SEP 2026

06disciplines00approved product awards

This six-discipline direction is separate from the older 44-sector publication. The recorded preview contains no approved buying recommendations.

Project notes Open development preview Main publication

Open WESTFALL novel spread: a Brellford perimeter-route map beside the Part IV title page, ‘Brellford—Conscience costs everything.’ — EXHIBIT 41-BBrellford perimeter route / Part IV

Open casefile

A research-grounded thriller
inside a fictional machine.

WESTFALL

Conscience Costs Everything.

TARGET RELEASE WINDOWChristmas Eve 2026 · 9:00 PM CST

MO: --
Days: --
HRS: --
MIN: --
SEC: --

The story: A former ISA operator uncovers a private program inside Brellford National Group, a fictional Northern Virginia defense contractor.
The fracture: As the secret surfaces, the company turns on itself—forcing loyalty, betrayal, control, and free will into the same fight for survival.
The boundary: Real-world research grounds the machinery. Brellford, its people, and its hidden program remain fiction.

WRITING / CONTINUITY

JotterDown

The manuscript stays the authority.

A writing workspace that keeps track of your story as it grows. See which scenes, characters, and facts a change would affect before you make it.

Inspect this capture

JotterDown sample manuscript with character, place, object and source context — WHAT TO NOTICE
The sample keeps the manuscript in the center, with characters, places, and sources beside it. This is the frontdoor’s illustrative page, not a private manuscript.
Current frontdoor source · illustrative sample · no private manuscript
Source & recording details
Source page
JotterDown frontdoor source / sample panel
Displayed image
Recorded frame · 20 OCT 2026
Date label source
Supplied metadata
Recorded edition
Current GitHub frontdoor source rendered locally at 2× density; sample panel
Source revision
apps/web/src/pages/index.astro blob f2e25c79d2c810712c6616f231e155bbb5cfcc2d
Open source site (opens in a new tab)

All recorded images:

01DRAFT02PREVIEW IMPACT03AUTHOR GATE

THE AUTHOR DECIDES The demo is read-only. Proposed changes need the author’s approval.

How JotterDown works Open JotterDown.app

Writing tools and story continuity

JOTTER DOWN × CANONWEAVE / INTEGRATION STUDY

The page stays quiet.
The story stays connected.

A proposed home for timelines, character paths, and source trails beside the manuscript. Inspect a change, see what it touches, and keep the author in control.

Inspect this capture

Canonweave public access gate stating the private story room is author-only — WHAT TO NOTICE
The public response is an author-only access gate; no private workspace is pictured.
Protected author workspace · only its public access boundary is shown
Source & recording details
Source page
canonweave.zacgibson.work/
Displayed image
Full record · 22 SEP 2026
Date label source
Legacy filename
Open source site (opens in a new tab)

All recorded images:

The story stays inside — 22 SEP 2026

Generated integration concept: a quiet Jotter Down writing page beside a Canonweave dock with separate world and book order, character paths, source trail, and author review. All story content is synthetic. — Proposed integration · generated design study · the products remain separateWriting page → source trail → author reviewInspect complete image (opens in a new tab)

Two orders, one story. World chronology stays distinct from the order a reader discovers it.

A source behind the connection. Character paths and continuity lead back to the material that supports them.

The author decides. Review creates an author-layer record; it does not silently rewrite a manuscript.

Inspect the Canonweave dossier Open Canonweave

CRUX / PAPER RESEARCH

Private research.
Visible accountability.

A paper-research cockpit that turns an investment hypothesis into a record you can inspect over time. The public window exposes the aggregate mark, verification state, and timestamp. The research process stays inside the lab.

The public record: Mark. State. Time.Aggregate value · verification · timestamp
Execution boundary: Paper onlyNo broker connection. Nothing traded.

The pictured mark is a dated paper snapshot. Open the public window for its current reported value and verification state.

Inspect the dossier Open the public window

Inspect this capture